-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 +1 on reverting this upload until a consensus among -motu and -devel can be reached. Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAki2GfEACgkQpblTBJ2i2puotQCeKAacMuKvT+X12/j70ePP53sG CpoAn3HqlBssPzJOey4hs1o/GG9sNv+T =YYNt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 27 August 2008 21:41, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> That said, having had the details brought to our attention, I do share many >> of your concerns about the contents of this upload. I gather from other >> comments Mathiaz made today on IRC that there was some pressure to get at >> least a preliminary solution into the archive in time for FeatureFreeze due >> to other packages depending on it, which may have played a role here; I >> hope that we'll be seeing further uploads to resolve many of these issues >> between now and Beta. > > Having spent roughly the last 75 minutes on IRC with Mathiaz, I am completely > unconvinced that any course other than reverting this change is appropriate. > Rather than take unilateral action, I'm asking for opinions on this. > > If we are going to put Gems in the system path, they ought to be well behaved > first. > > Scott K > > -- > Ubuntu-motu mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu > -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
