-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Potyra schrieb: > One argument against it raised in the past is, that this might lead to fewer > people reviewing a package (or giving an ACK for a package), as they might be > unsure about it.
Maybe the right fix for this the situation is to establish an easy way to - solicit feedback about a packaging situation one is unsure about - document the "best way to solve problem X" either in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews or https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide I can see a number of additional benefits in this solution. > As I've often cherrypicked reviews in the past (that is reviewed packages, > which had one ACK already), and very often found issues with these, I fear > that the package quality might get worse, and the rejection count from > ubuntu-archive might increase. Also in this case a feedback loop would help to educate the whole team. Have a nice day, Daniel - -- My 5 today: #210449 (network-manager-applet), #215043, #193764 (evolution-scalix), #215472 (gnome-themes-extras), #205756 (gnome- subtitles) Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIBc/yRjrlnQWd1esRAp6OAJ4uDi0g1YerErKWf6dCv0uCp9x3OQCdEzs5 b4uirRnEQjA62970RGSkse8= =bGZm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
