On Fr, 2007-12-21 at 12:15 +0200, Murat Gunes wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 08:46 +0100, Gauvain Pocentek wrote: > > > As I understand it, 'ubuntulove' could be used when a patch as to be > > written for ubuntu only (not for upstream). So I don't really see in > > what way 'ubuntulove' and 'bitesize' could be exchanged. I think that > > Jérôme who re-add the tag also understands this like I do. We could use > > a 'xubuntulove' tag for Xubuntu related patches, and get ride of the > > 'ubuntulove' I guess. > > That may be a good idea. I'm not sure what your understanding of the tag > is based on, but there's no indication anywhere that "ubuntulove" was > intended for things to be fixed in Ubuntu only; the description > in /Bugs/Tags was: > > "This bug is an 'Ubuntu love' task. Sometimes not hard to figure out, > sometimes a small project that could fix the bug. If you want to get > involved, you might want to start here." > > The question is: do the MOTU and Bug Squad teams need a tag for things > to be fixed in Ubuntu only, and if positive, should that be "ubuntulove" > from now on? > > m. > >
As I understand it, bugs that *do* need fixing elsewhere should be marked in LP (see [0]), so we wouldn't need a new tag for the opposite. [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage - Marking a Bug as Requiring Forwarding Regards, Kjell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
