Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If you have suggestion how to improve the documentation, let us > know. Where would you have expected documentation about > update-alternatives?
This is not the kind of problem which can be solved with documentation. Requiring users to RTFM in situations like this is a confession of UI design failure. See my mini-rant in response to Michael Olson. Would a Mac user, for example, ever have to RTFM to install such an update? > > More generally, I'm a fairly heavyweight Emacs expert (author of a > > couple of the standard-library packages, among other things). > > Please consider me available for package testing. > > Okay, I'm currently uploading Michaels emacs22 package to my personal > package archive. They should appear soon there. You can use the > following apt line for installing them (as soon as they get published > and built on the build daemons): > > deb http://ppa.dogfood.launchpad.net/siretart/ubuntu/ gutsy main universe > deb-src http://ppa.dogfood.launchpad.net/siretart/ubuntu/ gutsy main universe Um, this doesn't look like a command. Am I suppose to stuff it in a config file somewhere? Sorry for my ignorance, I'm a recovering Fedora user. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a> -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
