Hello everybody, Am Montag, den 30.10.2006, 23:52 -0500 schrieb Daniel T. Chen: > William Grant wrote: > > * The packages stays in -proposed until at least 5 people add "works for > > me" > > comments to the bug, and at least 5 days have passed since it was > > uploaded > > to -proposed. > > I recommend following main's/restricted's SRU more closely: Packages > should remain in release-proposed until 5 people have given affirmative > ACKs or 7 days have elapsed, whichever takes longer.
thanks a lot to everybody who stepped up and worked on this.
I agree with what Daniel wrote and have a few points to add myself:
* We should make sure that testers know that it's not a matter of
"I started the app and it doesn't crash on start-up". For
example: I uploaded a gdm to dapper-updates a while ago which
worked nicely and fixed a bunch of smaller issues. However did
it break "automatic login" which made people of a school with
kiosk computers quite unhappy. You might have encountered
similar examples already. Fixes sometimes do have side-effects.
We should take testing seriously.
* Who do we notify of testing? Simon Law too? UWN? ubuntu-users?
* Who's going to write this all up nicely on the wiki page? :-)
Have a nice day,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
