On 22/02/06 at 18:04 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > Rake is make for ruby. Many Ruby developers use it, but only one package > > (rails) depends on it. The package comes with a test suite. All tests pass. > > I'm a little bit undecided about it, as I don't see that (important) bugs are > fixed or must-have features are added. OTOH having a testsuite during build > (did understand that right?) is always a good thing, and all other changes > look pretty small.
The test suite was already there in 0.6.2. But it shows that the package doesn't break. > Generally my feeling is more towards a sync than to deny it, but I'd rather > hear other opinions first. It is the kind of package that makes developers' life hell if their package's version is lagging behind. E.g: Developer A writes a Rakefile which works with v. 0.7.0, but doesn't with v. 0.6.2. Developers B (dapper user) only has v. 0.6.2. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
