Hi Lucas, On Monday 06 February 2006 20:17, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 04/02/06 at 11:07 +0000, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Stephan Hermann wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 February 2006 01:06, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > >> I've put down the rationale for a Morgue for MOTUs on > > >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/MorgueForMOTU > > >> > > >> Please read it and let me know what you think of it. > > > > > > If the system of MoM is not working in a good way, then Canonical and > > > Ubuntu have problems. So therefore, it should be the task of Canonical > > > to fix this. > > > > I agree with Stephan. This is a problem in the infrastructure, which > > launchpad is intended to solve. > > I haven't heard elsewhere that LP was intending to solve this particular > problem. Really, Launchpad isn't the answer to life, the universe and > everything (it would have been called 42 if so). Also, I'm a bit > disapointed by the way LP tackled the bug tracking system problem, so > saying that Launchpad is going to solve that problem is a bit scary :-)
Well, it is not the answer, but it's the tool of choice for Ubuntu. Ubuntu is sponsored by Canonical, so everything related to the infrastructure to build and/or help Ubuntu to be made, is coming right now from Canonical. If this is a problem, please discuss this with the responsible people from the Ubuntu Foundation and/or Canonical. If you are disappointed in a way, that it makes it difficult to work for/with ubuntu, please state this on ubuntu-devel ML or bring the issues towards the TB. > > but as far as I understand, MoM and the patches directory are > > intended to be integrated into launchpad properly. > > any source for this ? It will or should be part of HCT. Please ask the Master Of MoM about it, Keybuck is Scotts nick on IRC. Regards, \sh -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
