On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs <[email protected] > wrote:
> On 11 June 2010 07:19, Bhavani Shankar R <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> <snip> > >> > >> Control & pyversions would be better =) or the whole branch the best ;-) > >> > >> Depends wether it's just a python package or compiled extension. > >> > >> Generally just a rebuild with bumped up pyversions =) > >> > > > > Why are you building Dell support package? Aren't they suppose to do it? > > > > Hello again! > > > > I followed your advice but it doesnt seem to work :( > > > > I took current package firmware-tools_2.1.9-0ubuntu1 and it's > absolutely correct and python2.6 ready. > > after you do "debuild", check debian/firmwaretools/ > > Notice that the python modules are in the correct pyshared dir & that > there are python-support private & public files. > > On my machine I have python2.6 installed, so after I have compiled & > installed 2.1.9-0ubuntu1 everything was fine. > > > > Attached is the control file for your reference > > > > Thanks now I know what package you are working on, and was able to > checkout latest available version from launchpad =) > > > Thanks in advance for your help! > > > > Your welcome. The 2.1.9-0ubuntu1 is absolutely fine. > > Thanks for your reply! I am working on that package from jaunty I think =) Its my favourite package since m on a dell =) got confused because of confusion between site-packages and dist-packages .. sorry for the trouble Regards -- Bhavani Shankar.R https://launchpad.net/~bhavi, a proud ubuntu community member. What matters in life is application of mind!, It makes great sense to have some common sense..!
-- Ubuntu-motu-mentors mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu-mentors
