N Ali wrote: > On 8/16/07, Martin Albisetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 8/16/07, Matthew East <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> What do people think? Can bad publicity can be turned into good >>> publicity? >>> >> >> I personally believe that a nice article (the fridge sounds >> right) with what will be done to prevent this in the future would >> suffice. Security breaches happen everywhere, so I don't really >> think anyone is seriously concerned, so as long as we show that >> it's taken seriously and professionally, it should fade away by >> itself. Having read through the slashdot and digg threads, I >> think it went pretty well in comparison to other similar horror >> stories :D >> >> Also adding it in the UWN sounds like a good idea, but not so >> much for the publicity, but so the community at large is >> informed. >> > > I'm a member of the LoCo Hosting Admin team. > > I'm going to write up something that tries to explain what happened > and what is being done. While many of the LoCo contacts have been > notified about their future hosting options, the rest of the > community is in the dark. > > I'll put it in the UWN and hopefully we can get it on the fridge.
Great. Will you be able to address wider issues such as how much more easily the community can be trusted than a professional organisation? Or at least talk up the advantages of the community way compared to another way? -- alan cocks Kubuntu user#10391 -- ubuntu-marketing mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
