Hello, Tony.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Tony Pursell
<a...@princeswalk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> Look good. Just two observations:
>
> 1. How is the 'approval' given to move from 'candidate' to 'final'? Who by?
Those status keywords are just examples that I pulled from the Mallard
site. I think we'd be better off establishing our own status keywords
that make sense for our process/project.
> 2. \version will be difficult for me. I have trouble working what package
> is the appropriate one, let alone finding out full package names
The \version command is just to give us a helpful hint that our
documentation may be out of date. If we have
\version{firefox}{20.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.10.3} (or even
\version{firefox}{20.0}) in one of the .tex files, to use Patrick's
example, and the new version of Firefox in Ubuntu 13.10 is 25.0, then
our helpful check-versions script will alert us to this fact so that
we know we should review that part of the documentation to ensure it's
still up to date.
—Kevin
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual
Post to : ubuntu-manual@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
