I've just completed editing the *Advanced Topics* and *Burning CD/DVD*sections of the manual. Now that the *Nautilus* name is no longer being used, I'd like to recommend we standardize the way we refer to *Files*. To me, *Nautilus* seemed to be more like an application, so it was acceptable to say *Nautilus application*...or just *Nautilus*...and the meaning was clear. The title *Files* has a number of meanings, and I don't see *Files* as an application per se, but more of a utility.
So, in my two sections edited thus far, I've referred to *Files* as *Files file browser*. Would it be beneficial to the user/reader for us to arrive at a common convention (similar to what we had to do with the *Dash* a few iterations ago)? If so, does *Files file browser *work? I'm presenting this suggestion in the hopes of a quick resolution before I edit the more dense *The Ubuntu Desktop* chapter. --Jim
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual Post to : ubuntu-manual@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
