I think that Thomas Cantara's feedback is great. In fact, I support it. Vish, I don't quite understand what you are saying about alphas and betas; as I read the wiki page you linked us to, I couldn't find a "only for use with alpha and beta releases of Ubuntu" warning. The words aren't even present in the document.
Now, I know that the X.YY are the official way to tag a release, but sooner or later people will be puzzled with the code names because they are used much in forums and IRC chatrooms. PS: Something just occurred to me. How about if we use a title like [The Ubuntu Manual: Get Started with Ubuntu 10.04/Lucid Lynx] and we make the word ubuntu big enough to be used in both title and subtitle? That way it will not look as repetitive. Also, I wrote 'Get Started' as it tells the user like 'lets do this' instead of 'read this when you want to get started'. It sounds more inviting and active, in my opinion. On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 01:50 +0530, Vishnoo wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 14:02 -0500, Thomas Cantara wrote: > > Having Ubuntu twice in the title seems redundant (as is this comment - > > I know that others have made the same observation), so why not try > > something like "The Ubuntu Manual: Getting Started with Lucid Lynx?" > > "Lucid Lynx" is supposed to be an alpha/beta version of the release and > if it is referred as LL is means an alpha or beta and not a final > product. ;) > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopmentCodeNames _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual Post to : ubuntu-manual@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
