-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gora Mohanty wrote: > Ah, just dashed off a reply with regards to this. > > However, I am much more of a hard-liner with respect to such nonsense. > While I can sympathise with a newbie who does this without realising > the implication, this sort of an attitude is actively encouraged by > so-called services like Twitter. So, my opinion is to fight fire > with fire. For the mailing lists that I administer, one such message, > and you are banned, at least until you explain why you should be let > back in. I wasn't sure whether he was a newbie or a seasoned spammer. I thought of giving him 24 hours to give an explanation and apology before I ban invoke the ban. As he hasn't yet given an explanation, I will put him under ban. I once again remind the list members that such careless spamming of the mailing lists can lead to getting banned. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH10w5k4vYYS/wECYRAvwpAJ9pgka8f3n39o37wqKJej/CN7kcOACfYHuw 8VLDoQsIpRDYruUZWPP48nE= =3dlF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ubuntu-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
