Thanks Utkarsh and Simon! On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:06, Utkarsh Gupta <utkarsh.gu...@canonical.com> wrote: > > The new version of last-align also caused a regression in nanook, > > which was removed from Debian testing. I updated LP: #2103924 > > requesting removal of nanook. > > Thanks - RM'd nanook. But why is the bug also targeting last-align? > IIUC, only nanook should be removed, right? Or am I missing something?
It also affects last-align, in that nanook's autopkgtest regression blocks the migration of last-align. Having last-align as an affected package, together with the 'update-excuse' tag, makes a link to the bug appear in last-align's migration status on update_excuses.html, like so: last-align (1542-1 to 1609-1) Migration status for last-align (1542-1 to 1609-1): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression Issues preventing migration: autopkgtest for nanook/1.33+dfsg-6: amd64: Regression ♻ , arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Not a regression, i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Regression ♻ Additional info: 49 days old Also see bug 2103924 last updated on Sun Mar 23 13:23:36 2025 Once last-align is no longer blocked, its status on the bug can be set to 'Invalid'. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
