I just ran our humble autopkgtests for a release candidate on Bionic i386 and it worked https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic-ua-client-staging/bionic/i386/u/ubuntu-advantage-tools/20250228_132214_a2649@/log.gz
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 2:00 PM Andreas Hasenack < andreas.hasen...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 1:55 PM Florent 'Skia' Jacquet > <florent.jacq...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > Hello there! > > > > Recently, something™ broke in the https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com > infrastructure > > around bionic i386. After the initial time spent to pin-point the issue, > I > > spend a little bit of time trying to repair that, but it seems I'm > missing some > > bits of the puzzle to correctly boot a pure 32 bits system in OpenStack. > That's > > certainly something that can be fixed if I invest enough time in that, > but > > taking a step back brought the following question: who still needs to > run i386 > > tests on trusty, xenial, and bionic? > > From what I've found, i386 does not seems to be covered by any ESM or > > pro support, and for all releases since focal, the tests are done in a > > foreign-architecture dpkg setup on amd64. > > Pro itself (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools) > is still SRUed to xenial and bionic, and it has i386 builds, and it > has autopkgtests. Not great autopkgtests, but it has them. > I believe also update-notifier > (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier) can get an SRU > for xenial and bionic. > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel >
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
