On 02.05.24 15:30, Robie Basak wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:15:59AM -0800, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
I'd like to suggest that we start setting NotAutomatic: yes for the
proposed pocket with hirsute+1, such that things like SRU verification
will be easier, and all those people who enable proposed in sources.list
for I don't know what reasons don't get their systems destroyed as much.
Now that we have an LTS out with NotAutomatic: yes, I wonder if it would
be worth looking to add the proposed pocket in apt sources by default
everywhere in future releases, like we do for backports[1].
Upside: it would make for even simpler instructions for users to test
something from proposed.
Downside: users would have yet more downloading on "apt update",
although perhaps we should expect the proposed lists to be small?
Often I see apt-get update downloads exceeding 100 MiB. That is without
a single package download.
When working with a mobile connection this is already problematic. We
should strive to get this number down. Adding proposed is going into the
wrong direction and would only help a tiny fraction of all users.
Best regards
Heinrich
To be clear, I'm on the fence, and polling for opinions.
Robie
[1] There are so many ways of deploying Ubuntu now that perhaps it's
worth reviewing them for consistent behaviour.
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel