On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 03:51:50PM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote: > Due to the size of the queues, I decided to start with the oldest > issues.
Out of interest, how did you identify these "oldest issues"? I happened to spend some time on proposed-migration on Thursday, and all of the packages I worked on are older than the oldest package on your list, AFAICS. (The *youngest* package I worked on was node-object-inspect, which is currently 208 days old.) > # sparse > I'm under the impression that upstream doesn't run their own testsuite > at the moment. > For instance, there is a diagnostic which has been changed in 2019 in > 2094267c7d36d8696897c509558fc63e8a695765 and new testcases have been > added with that diagnostic but older ones have not been updated > accordingly (the one failing because of that change has been created in > 2018 and hasn't been changed since then). > All in all this seemed to much for a +1 shift and I didn't act on the > package. > > # blurhash-python > I tried to reproduce the issue which occured on armhf but I didn't > manage to. There were actually two different issues and that made me > think the issues were unrelated to this package. Due to the size of the > queues, I didn't ask for re-triggers. This package has since migrated. I guess someone did retrigger and it passed. Please don't be shy about retriggering because of the queues; the tests get run eventually... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
