On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:25:39PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > As William Wilson and Graham Inggs mentioned, there seems to be a higher > than usual amount of FTBFS compared with autopkgtest failures. There > doesn't seem to be a common pattern going on, just a lot of package > ecosystems in flux. Like them, I focused mostly on FTBFS issues, and a > little attention on the sponsoring queue.
> (There are also a large number of NBS package issues currently, although > I didn't look at them. Several transitions like icu, libphobos2, > libpoppler118, and libqgis appear to be in process.) These transitions have all been under way for quite a while now (>= 1 week). There's of course no obligation to spend time on NBS packages in particular during +1 maintenance, but it is always valuable to look there, as unlike proposed-migration, NBS must be zeroed before we can release. (BTW maybe you meant libgdal rather than libqgis?) From my perspective, it would be particularly helpful if someone would go through the process of filing any necessary bugs in Debian for the reverse-dependencies of libicu70, libgdal30, libnetpbm10, and librocksdb6.11 so that we can in good conscience remove these packages from kinetic pending Debian resolution of the build failures. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
