On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 9:10 AM Robie Basak <robie.ba...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 04:27:31PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > This is now ready to use from the Launchpad point of view. There's a > > "proposed_not_automatic" flag on distro series exported over the API; if > > this is set to True, Launchpad writes "NotAutomatic: yes" and > > "ButAutomaticUpgrades: yes" to the Release file. We've also arranged > > for *-proposed to be pinned to 500 in launchpad-buildd, so Launchpad > > builds will ignore this; I can't speak for other build environments. > > > > Thus, from the Launchpad point of view this is ready to use, although > > somebody may want to check the behaviour of things like sbuild and > > pbuilder first. > > Thank you Colin for the work! > > If sbuild/pbuilder need adjusting, then maybe we need to do that and > then give developers some time to update their chroots so that we don't > break them (in non-obvious ways) all at once. > > Another thought is that if there turns out to be an unintended > consequence for users enabling jammy-proposed (after Jammy's release), > then we'll have done that to them in an LTS instead of hitting an > interim release first.
This is certainly a concern for me...this kind of change seems like it's more appropriate for an interim release. > That might adversely affect SRU verification > workflow. But given that jammy-proposed is (after release) specifically > for opt-in and more-risky-than-stable testing, perhaps that doesn't > warrant delaying until Keen. > > -- > technical-board mailing list > technical-bo...@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
