On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:44 PM Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 01:48:28PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > Hi Steve (and all of Ubuntu-dev), > > so far things almost worked as expected :-) > > > The change for openmp [1] worked and migrated to groovy-release. > > The new dependency worked as well and germinate [2] now reports to no > > more pull in rdma-core on i386. > > But on the subsequent sync of rdma-core [3] I see i386 is still trying > > to be built. > > So I face the obvious "missing build on i386: ibacm, ..." [4] in > > update-excuses. > > > I wonder what to do now, is this another case not yet documented in [5]? > > Do I need to call for an archive admin to update the "effective > > whitelist" accordingly? > > Yes, that's exactly what needs to happen. The whitelist is not > automatically updated, it requires an archive admin to review any > autogenerated changes and commit them. > > I've rerun the script now, and rdma-core has dropped out of the whitelist.
Thanks, I have uploaded a no-change rebuild and can confirm it picked this up now. > We will then also have to remove the rdma-core binaries on i386 in the > release pocket. Yes I've filed a removal bug for that. => https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rdma-core/+bug/1880651 P.S. As for the former parts of this discussion I have put (my) new insight into the i386 wiki page to help everyone else as well > > Thanks in advance, > > Christian > > > > [1]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openmpi/4.0.3-6ubuntu2 > > [2]: > > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.groovy/i386+build-depends > > [3]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rdma-core/29.0-1 > > [4]: > > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html > > [5]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/i386 > > > > > > > But then I have realized that while there are not more runtime > > > > > dependencies, build dependencies in i386 seem to be quite a lot still > > > > > (reverse-depends --release=groovy --arch=i386 --build-dep > > > > > src:rdma-core shows 41). > > > > > > > > As far as I know these are all false-positives; I don't know that > > > > reverse-depends --build-dep --arch=foo ever does anything useful. > > > > Spot-checking the output, I see that most of these packages only have > > > > arch: > > > > all packages published on i386. > > > > > > > > > With this mail I'd look for: > > > > > a) general guidance on `is the effective i386 build = whitelist + > > > > > build-deps` > > > > > b) feedback on the suggestion to remove the rdma-core build dep on > > > > > openmpi; or would all 41 build-deps have to go away? > > > > > c) other alternatives > > > > > > > > > The answers to (a) we could add to the wiki [4]. > > > > > The answers to (b)+(c) will hopefully help me to go on with this, it > > > > > might eventually come down to keeping the current Delta (trivial) in > > > > > rdma-core, but along the way understanding the inner workings better > > > > > would be great. > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rdma-core/28.0-1ubuntu1 > > > > > [2]: > > > > > https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/756#issuecomment-630138899 > > > > > [3]: > > > > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-process-for-32-bit-compatibility/12598 > > > > > [4]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/i386 > > > > > [5]: > > > > > https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/i386/tree/i386 > > > > > [6]: > > > > > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends.sources > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free > > > > OS > > > > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the > > > > world. > > > > Ubuntu Developer > > > > https://www.debian.org/ > > > > slanga...@ubuntu.com > > > > vor...@debian.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Christian Ehrhardt > > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server > > > Canonical Ltd > > > > > > > > -- > > Christian Ehrhardt > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server > > Canonical Ltd > > > > -- > > ubuntu-devel mailing list > > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel > > -- > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. > Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ > slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
