On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 17:20, Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > The second test rebuild of Eoan Ermine was started on September 06 2019 for > all architectures, all components. The rebuild of the main component is > finished, the other components (restricted, universe, multiverse) are still > building. > > Unfortunately we see 1300+ build failures, and still counting ... On the > other > hand the test rebuild includes the recent GCC, glibc packages, and the > glib2.o/gtk packages synced from experimental. > > Results (please also look at the superseded builds) can be found at > > https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20190906-eoan.html > > The report uses some additional color coding, marking packages different which > always failed to build, or where the build failure is no regression compared > to > bionic. The test rebuild already uses the linux-libc-dev 5.3 package found in > the ubuntu-toolchain-r/volatile PPA. > > Additional build failures for packages in eoan-proposed (not yet in eoan) > can be found at http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ > > Please help fixing the build failures. >
Fixed btrfs-progs, submitted pull request upstream. Fixed d-i/s390x build. > There is also a test rebuild with link time optimization turned on by default > (passing -flto=auto in CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS). Other distributions turned these > optimzations on by default, or are considering doing that. > > https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20190906-lto-eoan.html > > Packages to use -flto by default (dpkg) can be found in the > ubuntu-toolchain-r/dpkg-lto PPA. WARNNING: Make sure to install these dpkg > packages in a throw-away environment. Are you going to copy in fixed up packages to update the report? Or can coredevs do that somehow? -- Regards, Dimitri. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
