Hey guys,
some versions ago (16.04) a
cold start to me 16 seconds.
With all later versions even with SSD harddrives it takes over
a minutes.
These MS windows start up times and from my point of view sometimes wired.
I saw that all kind of snap where loaded additional checks and so on.
- Is this really necessary?
- Is there a way to reduce the
start up time by starting the most important jobs first and
something which are not so important later (asynchon) or by
special requests?
In the past firefox have had
the same problem and in the latest versions the load and start
up time reduced.
Even informix is doing the same as I suggested above.
Why shall this be done?
- For test purposes?
- Installation of new instances
- After crashes
- After problems
- When an upgrade really needs a reboot
- Overal usability of the system
- When someone, like me, will get a support request by a
customer for a severity 1 request and one have to make a cold
start of its system.
It would be fine when it will be possible to come back to
better start up times in the future.
This is not only helpfull for the desktop version even for the
server version this would be a good feature.
Best regards,
Knuth
Mit
freundlichen Grüßen |
|||
Knuth J.Hartlieb Max-Joseph-Straße
2 |
|
|
|
Phone: |
+49
(0)89.94 30 13 75 |
||
This facsimile may
contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information and is exclusively intended to the
intended addressee. |
<<attachment: mail.vcf>>
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss