> * Did you test your format on a slow HDD with caches dropped? It >> must not be slower than the Python one (that one is way too slow >> already) - I did, it seems to be faster (0.4 vs 0.68 seconds) >> - I believe the database-based C rewrite was even much faster, >> though >> > I tested with kyotocabinet backend and it was slower with dropped caches on a hard drive (1 second), which is the slow case I am most concerned with. Small makes a difference. The code is at https://github.com/shawnl/command-not-found/tree/kyotocabinet
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
