On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 08:29 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Jamie Strandboge [2017-01-10 16:27 -0600]: > > > > Remote logging. Rsyslog is far superior in this regard. Granted, remote > > logging > > is not enabled by default but it is a requirement in many environments. > The systemd-journal-remote package does provide the necessary tools and is > reasonably flexible (push or pull, builtin https or using arbitrary ports > which > you e. g. could forward through ssh). It might not be as flexible as rsyslog, > but as one needs to set up remote logging manually anyway, you always have the > possibility of picking rsyslog, journal, or even something else. > Yes, but the 'logged to' system needs to be running systemd[1]. rsyslog speaks the standard syslog protocol on 514/udp, but systemd-journal does not.
[1]https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-journal-remote.html -- Jamie Strandboge | http://www.canonical.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
