On 9 October 2016 at 15:43, Xen <l...@xenhideout.nl> wrote: > Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 14:38: >> >> On 9 October 2016 at 12:56, Xen <l...@xenhideout.nl> wrote: >>> >>> Colin Law schreef op 09-10-2016 9:28: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> I was not commenting on any particular topic, merely pointing out that >>>> that Ralf (I think) said there are some things that Linux "does not >>>> allow" and you answered this with a post referring to things that >>>> Linux "can't" do and the two things are not the same. I also stated >>>> that things that Linux will not allow are generally security related. >>>> >>>> Is any of that untrue? >>> >>> >>> >>> You might as well state that the sun is not green and that might also not >>> be >>> untrue. But the question is whether that is relevant or related or >>> whether >>> it is a showstopper. >> >> >> That is one question, but as I said it was not my point. I was merely >> pointing out that you had misread or misinterpreted the earlier post. >> Nothing more or less than that. > > > And that is simply not true. And apparently you are arguing for the sake of > arguing.
In what way is it not true, it was my first post on this thread and all I said was: "I think there is a difference between *can't* meaning is not able to and *won't allow* meaning there is something specifically stopping that from happening. The *won't allow* features are generally for security reasons." Colin -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
