*chuckle*
I think you hit it on the head with the house numbers... Eventually,
people will just get a house in a different neighborhood if things
become too stupid where they live.
Thx also for the follow-up on the code. Too bad there is no easy fix
outside of boot params.
-ml
PS: in 12.04, one of my MB NIC's came in as dev "virbr0"... perhaps
"en[whatever]" is not so bad after all...
On 7/20/2016 8:00 PM, Xen wrote:
Markus Lankeit schreef op 20-07-2016 23:54:
Hi Xen,
Thanks for going to bat for us on this--sorry that no one wanted to
hear you. Odd that a Debian dev would balk at this... Last I loaded
the latest Debian (about a month ago), I got the good-old "ethx"
interface names. Hmm....
Totally agree with your assessment that the argument "for" this new
naming scheme is ludicrous and illogical... Thankfully, there is a
relatively simple way to disable this scheme (
http://askubuntu.com/questions/767786/changing-network-interfaces-name-ubuntu-16-04).
Yes. But... I don't like changing boot parameters for this (it means
the sanity of my system is now wholly dependent on my bootloader's
configuration file, which is a dependency I do not want to have; any
form of alternative booting of the kernel now *also* needs to
reference those parameters for the system to keep functioning as
normal (if it uses any firewall scripts or the like) which is
something I don't want and don't want to invest in.
It should be purely based on on-disk structures that either just
belong to /etc, (preferably) or get added to the initrd.
The udev rule is convenient enough except that udev is
incomprehensible so the only way to manage this is to keep a notition
of this in some convenient internet location of your own because
invariably you are going to lose access to wherever you have stored
it, and you can't memorize this or produce it from memory.
Meaning, unless you have some trustworthy access to this information
you will not be able to reproduce it when you configure a new system
and you will just forget and not care.
Which seems to be the intent of the designers: that it is so hard or
inconvenient that most people just won't bother and use the default.
Hence, more people using what they want.
I believe the way to turn off the system is to do:
ln -s /dev/null /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
Which I did in the beginning but I can never remember the name.
At a certain point I fixed my static IP in a central dnsmasq config
file so my static IPs are getting fixed through DHCP but before I
definitely didn't have this facility and simply preferred to use
/etc/network/interfaces which became hideous under this system.
I still don't like seeing this enp4s0 (under the previous motherboard
it was enp3s0, go figure) whenever I look under the hood and detest it
to the bone.
It is like calling a house in a street with no other houses, house
number 2530.
2530 Empty Street.
Why 2530? Well, the hash of the number of bricks used to built the
house was 2530, that's why.
Makes sense right. right. Maybe I will use this thread to find this
information ;-).
Regards.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
