Oops :D
>On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:18:44 -0500, Kaosu NA wrote:
>>Not only will something like this be more user-friendly, but it
>>also allows a large number of Ubuntu users to take advantage of a
>>modern security technology without giving up usability.
>
>Secure boot is modern, but it is useful for Linux and BSD users? Most
^^^^^
^^^^^
is it
>user-friendly still is to disable secure boot, isn't it?
>
>What are the benefits of secure boot for Linux and BSD users, who
>don't have a dual or multi boot with a Windows install, that requires
>it?
>
>I'm neither using SELinux, nor AppArmor or anything else. Isn't
>AppArmor part of default Linux install? Isn't this enough additional
>security? ^^^^^
^^^^^ Ubuntu ;)
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
