On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 05:08:03 -0400, Tom H wrote: >Are you editing ".config" manually?
Yes ... >if yes, why don't you use "make menuconfig" (or another config target) >because there are dependencies that you can't account for when using >vi/nano/emacs/whatever. ... OTOH if you get an error for /bar/staging/foo, you easily can find CONFIG_FOO and "disable" it. If you use menuconfig instead it's not that pleasant. Dependencies are seldom an issue (were never an issue, IIRC I run into this issue for the first time). >I run the rc kernels on my laptop and about a year decided to stop >fiddling around with kernel configs so I use the Arch, Fedora, and >Ubuntu configs in rotation for each rc series; and my kernels compile >without a hitch. I agree that "usually" there aren't issues, it's likely related to an oldish kernel I try to build. [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ uname -r 3.10.61-rt65-1-rt-lts >(You're running "make oldconfig" twice in [1], not that it should >really matter.) It might be neurotic, but I like to verify, that really everything is done after oldconfig run, that's why I run it a second time. I already planed to use menuconfig next time, but I suspect it isn't easy to find CONFIG_MPILIB. I'm not sure if this will help when using menuconfig http://ss-log.blogspot.de/ (at the bottom "GnuPG MPILIB", other links were less informatively) it didn't help, when manually editing. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
