Sorry, I don't wanted to say, that more screens are uncommon absolutely. I wanted to say, that they are quite uncommon relatively to how often presentations are used. At least in the world where I am moving. Sorry for missunderstanding. I have written it in a bad way. I don't want to do anything with the current multiple screen implementation. It is a prefect solution for working. But not so good for presenting.
Marek 2015-04-29 2:20 GMT+02:00 Dale Amon <a...@vnl.com>: > Actually you will find the use of 2, 3 and 4 screens > very common. Walk through an accounting office. True > they are in the windows world, but multi-screens are > basic to their work flow. > > Similarly (also windows), you will find that in the > case of many engineering applications, two screens > are essential. SolidWorks for example. > > You did mention developers. I am always moving cursor > between screens and have programs in both. Actually > I wish I had more screens. Even 4 dual screen desk tops > isn't enough for me. > > Not to suggest that making it easier to do what you > suggest is a bad idea... I just wanted to correct any > impression that multiple screens is unusual in any > way. > >
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
