hi All,
Why does libtomcat7-java depend on libcommons-pool-java? I suspect this change: Description: Make jdbc-pool module default Tomcat upstream ships a patched version of Commons DBCP. This is not shipped in the Debian packages. . It also provides an alternative, lightweight pool implementation which is shipped. . This patch makes this implementation the default pool. Author: James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/1071817 Forwarded: not-needed --- This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ --- a/java/org/apache/naming/factory/Constants.java +++ b/java/org/apache/naming/factory/Constants.java @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Package + ".HandlerFactory"; public static final String DBCP_DATASOURCE_FACTORY = - "org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory"; + "org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory"; public static final String OPENEJB_EJB_FACTORY = Package + ".OpenEjbFactory"; --- a/webapps/docs/config/systemprops.xml +++ b/webapps/docs/config/systemprops.xml @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ <property name="javax.sql.DataSource.Factory"> <p>The class name of the factory to use to create resources of type <code>javax.sql.DataSource</code>. If not specified the default of - <code>org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory</code> is used + <code>org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory</code> is used which is a package renamed (to avoid conflictions) copy of <a href="http://commons.apache.org/dbcp";>Apache Commons DBCP</a>.</p> </property> --- a/webapps/docs/jndi-resources-howto.xml +++ b/webapps/docs/jndi-resources-howto.xml @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ conn.close(); <p>The configuration properties for Tomcat's standard data source resource factory - (<code>org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory</code>) are + (<code>org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory</code>) are as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>driverClassName</strong> - Fully qualified Java class name If so, why is this change? I don't find anything about the reason, though I can see, that other distributions do the same more or less. Also why does it depend on libcommons-pool-java? Why is it not just recommended or suggested? My problem is that if our developers need a different version of library, they need to remove the symlink from the tomcat/lib directory. What would be the recommended official solution in cases like this? Thanks, tamas -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
