On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, John Moser <john.r.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 02/05/2013 07:45 PM, Ryan Tandy wrote: >> >> John Moser <john.r.moser <at> gmail.com> writes: >>> >>> 2. Convince Ubuntu to put the newest Puppetmaster in Backports. I am >>> not advocating this either. >> >> >> Slightly off-topic, but FWIW I would be happy to see raring's puppet >> (whatever version that ends up being) in precise-backports. >> lucid-backports has puppet 2.7 and that made my life a LOT easier since >> my puppetmaster runs precise and I am using some recent modules. Having >> backports available but not installed by default is really quite nice. >> Furthermore it's quite likely that at some point I'll have some clients >> running a newer Ubuntu than the puppetmaster, and it would be great to >> be able to support it just by upgrading puppetmaster to a backports >> version. >> >> > > http://apt.puppetlabs.com/ > > While we're at it, why is etckeeper stuff in the package? The Puppetlabs > guys said because it's in Debian's package and "Debian packagers are > fruitbats", so they're imitating "for compatibility."
I know Nigel Kirsten and Andrew Pollock, so if there is stuff wrong in the debian packaging I am happy to chat with them. -A > > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
