It's called eiciel -- Matt Wheeler m...@funkyhat.org On 17 Oct 2012 21:15, "John Moser" <john.r.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John Moser <john.r.mo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > First: that's why we need an interface that handles POSIX ACLs > > properly, long-overdue. > > > > It actually occurs to me that this is probably not just technically > important, but important for planning purposes. That is, we can sit > here arguing all day about theoretical use cases, but everybody is > going to have differing opinions that lean in odd directions until > certain things are fixed. Or in short, as long as POSIX ACLs require > a scout badge in command line comfort, discussing how to leverage > POSIX ACLs is pointless because people don't want to think two steps > out. > > Let's see if we can get anything agreeable on that. It'll probably > look strikingly like Windows' Security tab, except without supplying > Allow/Deny, fine grained special permissions (which don't exist), or > having all the Windows main permissions. So, it'll look like the only > thing that makes sense in general, and specifically for Unix. That > is, a few rows of controls for Owner, Group, and then a list box of > permissions with one row with three checkboxes per row for each user > (Owner, Group, Everyone, individual users/groups). > > Can we get that? > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss >
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
