On Sep 27, 2011, at 01:02 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >If you aim your minimum Python version at 2.6, it's not that hard to write >code that works with both python and python3. If you want a "P" target for >Python3, I'd suggest getting Ubuntu custom code working in either so that we >can through the switch when ready would be a really good goal.
If we drop 2.6 for P, then 2.7 will be the minimum Python, but in any event, I agree with you. I have to admit that after thinking about this a lot, I am torn between wanting to aggressively lead on the migration to Python 3, and wanting to have a really stable P-series with no ftbfs or other lurking problems in our Python 2 stack. My conservative side is peeking out. :) To the extent that we can do both, great. I will put this on our agenda for UDS-P and I'm sure we'll get a lively and diverse discussion about our short and long term plans here. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
