Emmet Hikory [2010-11-24 3:18 +0900]: > If folks wish to support a target that doesn't have a current kernel > image, but can be supported by only configuration changes to the > Ubuntu kernels, should they request more kernel images be produced > by the kernel team, or upload their own derivative kernels?
A new binary flavour from the same linux source package would be preferable here, as it greatly reduces the overhead of the extra upload, extra archive administration (NEWing), and extra SRU processing. I know that the linaro armel kernels were just split from a common source package, which seems like a step backwards. This was a trade-off to be able to build several of them in parallel. But i386/amd64 architectures/builders are "fast enough" and also multi-core, so I'd love to see this workaround being limited to arm kernels. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
