Am Donnerstag, den 10.06.2010, 19:24 +0200 schrieb Remco: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 19:10, Remco <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:53, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Once again: those are bugs. Let's just focus on solving the problem in > >> the existing kernel instead of adding another one. > >> > >> It's more difficult to segregate the non-free material so it can be > >> provided via the restricted repository for those that want it than it is > >> just to rip it all out, but that's the way to support both freedom of > >> software and freedom of choice. > >> > > > > Agreed. My lingering question is, does this bug actually exist? I was > > under the impression that all the non-free parts were already removed > > when the "free-only" option was selected. > > Debian, for example, separates the firmware into a free and a non-free > variant: > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=firmware-linux > > Ubuntu does not use those package names. Where did the firmware end up > in Ubuntu?
Just search for package with 'firmware' in its name. We have linux-firmware in main and linux-firmware-nonfree in multiverse. -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
