On 24 May 2010 17:57, Conrad Knauer <ath...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs > <dmitrij.led...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >>> Tomboy can be replaced with Gnote >> >> Gnote is abandoned by the author > > On what basis do you claim this? >
Last time I cared about Tomboy vs Gnote arguments it was this: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnote-list/2009-October/msg00001.html > Lucid uses 0.6.2 according to http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=gnote > > I note the following release dates according to the files in > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnote/ > > gnote-0.6.3 28-Nov-2009 > gnote-0.6.4 22-Mar-2010 > > gnote-0.7.0 31-Dec-2009 > gnote-0.7.1 04-Jan-2010 > gnote-0.7.2 12-Mar-2010 > > Debian is up to 0.7.1 as per http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=gnote > Fair enough so taking ~6 months as cutoff date which puts at gnote 0.6.2 & tomboy 1.1.0 Comparing: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnote/tree/NEWS http://git.gnome.org/browse/tomboy/tree/NEWS >> and has less functionality then Tomboy (less plugins, no ubuntuone >> integration etc.) > > Please see http://www.stefanoforenza.com/getting-gnote-facts-straight/ > So has the syncing been implemented yet? IMHO it's the killer feature to sync tomboy with linux, mac, win & cloud. Also note that gnote vs tomboy in terms of disk space savings is really about gtkmm vs mono. As far as I remember (again could be out-of-date and less relevant with GObject-Interspcection) that gtkmm is big and currently not-included by default on Ubuntu CD's. ps. I use emacs-org mode and I don't have tomboy/gnote installed =) -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
