Just in case you haven't seen some of the previous conversation on this topic, Mark Shuttleworth has talked about rolling releases verse time based releases here: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/tag/cadence He makes some compelling arguments for time based releases.
> There should be a prioritization for "FIX AVAILABLE" whereby SOMEHOW > these get tested. Someone needs to drop them into an additional > "Testing" repository (this is more volatile than -proposed), and alert > upstream that there's such a patch. I'm talking about "it compiled, > it ran on my workstation, I'm throwing it in -testing," not "Well it > compiles and runs, we've vetted it, tested it somewhat, we're putting > it in -proposed for wider developer testing." Apparently there's no > such resources to do some pretty basic work. You should probably talk to the upstreams that you think could benefit from this, and ask what they think. Your idea won't matter a whole lot if the upstreams aren't paying attention. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
