On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 16:20 +1000, Chris Jones wrote: > I'm still a little shocked that F-Spot is still included by default. Any > software developer or any geek with a basic understanding of software > development and programming knows that F-Spot is one of the worst > examples of programming code/platform. To put it simply, it's shocking > and to be honest I won't have a piece of it. > > I'm a photographic imaging professional and I use too many imaging apps > to list here, but F-Spot is not one of them, for the simple reason it is > slow, clunky and has crap file format support for anything outside of > JPEG format. > > The Ubuntu Developers clearly have no understanding of this sector of > technology and the IT industry and that sector being > digital/photographic imaging. And if they did, they would ditch F-Spot > and replace it with a suitable and "real" image management package. > There are alternatives out there that have been mentioned 100 times > already (which I'm not going to mention again). The developers seem to > either have their hands full with other projects or are walking around > with curtains over their eyes.
I'd really love to know more about the alternatives that have been mentioned a 100 times if you don't mind. I can't find any personally.Not that I like F-Spot, but I can't see much of an alternative. Cheers, Mohammed Bassit -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
