Markus Hitter wrote: > > Am 26.10.2009 um 12:08 schrieb Dirk Hoeschen: > >> Now (3 days before the release) karmic seems to be unready. >> Even if the system is stable, I found many bugs and inconsistent >> issues. > > Obviously, the team is totally overwhelmed by bugs. Look for example > at bug #459067: > > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/ > 459067> > > Introduced last week, this bug requires me to go to the keyboard > manager after each reboot before I can make use of the keyboard. Yet > is is considered as "Importance low", means, "likely never fixed > intentionally". > Means "likely never fixed, unless it can be shown to affect more than a handful of people _or_ you provide better information". q.v. the Intel graphics bug which had a handful of people screaming that the 9.04 release had to be delayed, but affected only a tiny proportion of even the Intel users. And was fixed only a month or so post-release.
> All those regressions make me start to think about _why_ I use > cutting edge Ubuntu. Me too. Why _do_ you if you don't like bugs? I still can't see any sign of what you call "all those regressions"/ -- derek -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
