On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 18:24 +0100, Matthew East wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas <m...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > coz DS wrote on 12/10/09 17:05: > >> > >> Hey all, > >> I am running ubuntu 9.10 right now fresh install... I noticed no > >> icons under System menu and a few missing from Places menu in Gnome. > > > > There are fewer icons in menus generally. Places and System are just two > > examples. > > Shouldn't this be an all or nothing approach? I'm not attached to the > icons myself but it does look a bit inconsistent in these menus to > have some items without icons and other items (or submenu items) with > icons. It makes it look, at least to me, as if the icons are missing > by accident. Maybe it is worth discussing with upstream whether there > is widespread agreement on the right approach, and following that.
I have to agree. Having icons in the main menu looks good and professional but having them missing from the System menu makes the system look...well, unfinished. Cheers -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
