On Sunday 07 June 2009 8:22:41 pm Mark Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Christopher
> > So, your saying that theres not a single corporation that has ${Vital
> > Application} written in .net? I'm not saying that it was a good
> > choice, but that is the way it is and Ubuntu not supporting it makes
> > it difficult for them to leave MS.
>
> but that's not how MONO is being used. it is being used to poison our
> desktops with patented M$ technology with junk like banshee and tomboy
> and f-spot. if I wanted *.dll and *.exe's on my system I would just
> run WINDOWSFilename extensions are how you choose your OS? Huh...alright, well, that's a new one. You know I can name a shell script with .exe at the end and still have the first line be "#! /bin/bash" right? > but they are the people that are infiltrating ubuntu and canonical > people like directhex and the gnome-do developer I forget the name Jo is a nice fellow, met him at UDS. Didn't seem very much to be infiltrating...more like sitting around being cheerful and chatting with whatever folks sat down. > > - How strong is the evidence for these accusations? > > there is proof posted in both articles Please reread. The question was not "where is the proof?" but rather "*how strong* is the proof?" > > - Who is in a position to rectify this? > > I don't know that's why I'm writing here to get the MONO people kicked out Ah, but that would be exclusionary and so...un-Ubuntu... -- Mackenzie Morgan http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com apt-get moo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
