On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:31 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > Undoubtly, efforts to avoid regressions are a very good thing. One > possible solution is to offer the possibility to roll back to or keep > the previous technology. Perhaps you want to have a look at other > distros to get an idea on how they deal with this challenge: > As far as I'm aware, there aren't any distributions doing 6-monthly releases that deal with this challenge.
Those that do use longer release cycles, with more time for testing and bug fixing. (Indeed, the most obvious other distribution that performs a 6-monthly release - Fedora - is arguably even more bleeding edge and less conservative than we are!) Scott -- Scott James Remnant sc...@canonical.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
