That's good, but why even include compiz in the first place? Doesn't it just take up extra space that could be used for something more useful (isn't there a problem with keeping Ubuntu small enough to fit onto a CD?)
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Joe Terranova <joeterran...@gmail.com>wrote: > As it is, compiz is tried, and Ubuntu falls back on Metacity if it > doesn't work. So if they don't have the "hardware", they'll use > Metacity. > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Danny Piccirillo > <danny.picciri...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > Would it be a good idea to plan to use Metacity as the default > compositing > > manager for Ubuntu instead of compiz in the future? > > > > Compiz seems mostly unnecessary. If metacity was used, it would be easier > on > > the machine and work for people who don't have the hardware for compiz. > > Anyone who wants all the exra effects can still install compiz, but for > > almost everyone, shouldn't metacity be fine? > > > > -- > > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > > > > >
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
