On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 00:47 +0100, Alexander Jones wrote: > 2008/7/8 Evan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Mark Shuttleworth has already proposed something along these lines. I can't > > find it at the moment, but it's in a post somewhere at markshuttleworth.com > > > > I also think this would help significantly. > > I believe Mark proposed only a synchronisation on the six-monthly > cycle. I am suggesting 2 years for major changes to the platform.
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/146 : If two out of three of Red Hat (RHEL), Novell (SLES) and Debian are willing to agree in advance on a date to the nearest month, and thereby on a combination of kernel, compiler toolchain, GNOME/KDE, X and OpenOffice versions, and agree to a six-month and 2-3 year long term cycle, then I would happily realign Ubuntu’s short and long-term cycles around that. -- Michael R. Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.suppressingfire.org/~burner/ http://suppressingfire.livejournal.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
