Just that Mono implements more than that; surely System.Windows.Forms ist not part of the ECMA spec? What about Moonlight? It would be a very wise step to separate the ECMA and non-ECMA parts in the Mono upstream so that if hard comes to harder, it can be easily "removed" from the Mono distribution.
2008/6/10 Christopher James Halse Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 19:54 +0200, Milosz Derezynski wrote: > > Sorry for dropping in. > > > > Has there been any mention of Microsoft that they will never, ever sue > > anyone who uses Mono nor the Mono developers themselves, or is this > > all under the Novell/Microsoft convenant? If they never made such a > > statement, on what else than pure hope that they will never litigate > > can something like Mono be built? > > > Yes. All the EMCA-standardised parts of the CLI are available under > royalty-free non-descriminatory terms. Link: > > http://web.archive.org/web/20030424174805/http://mailserver.di.unipi.it/pipermail/dotnet-sscli/msg00218.html > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > >
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
