Daniel T. Chen ha scritto: > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 19:26 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> As a rule, developers aren't terribly impressed by version numbers. What >> problem are you >> having that you think this would fix and that is severe enough to warrant a >> stable release >> update? > > Really seems like a gutsy-backports candidate, not a gutsy-updates one. > > -Dan >
I didn't know this ubuntu policy. Ubuntu shipped an RC version, and then is going to keep it for 6 months. You should ask gimp developers what they prefer! Even though I expect many of them to be reading this thread :) What if next release of gimp is close, for hoardy? Then will ubuntu release again the next RC? It seems like if gimp had a 6 months release cycle too, ubuntu would ship RC forever. This should not be the case - RCs shipped with ubuntu releases should be "promoted" to stable releases as soon as possible. Or else ubuntu stable releases should wait for stable of all projects, which is impossible. Vincenzo -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
