Matt, > I'm a bit confused by the question. What does the license have to do with > it? A big, MIT-licensed program would seem to raise exactly the same > issues.
You are right, of course. It was a slip to choose one license instead of just saying "open source". > That's not exactly how it works; popcon statistics are actually dominated by > the choice of default software, not the other way around. While we do > consider relative popularity when selecting programs for the default > install, popcon is unfortunately not very useful for this at the moment. I expected that to be the case for the actual files installed and for the Desktop CD. I was thinking of was the extra packages that are put on the alternate install CD/the DVD - I understood that popcon was used to determine which to put on there to fill up the space. Thanks for your help, Aaron -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
