On 20/06/07 06:36, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote: > OK, so I should have said 'Ubuntu developer' (member of core dev or > MOTU) instead of 'developer'. Lots of fixes are being worked on by > upstreams or other non-Ubuntu developers all the time, but we don't mark > a bug as In Progress unless someone is working on a fix in Ubuntu, or at > least in a remote bugtracker to which we have set an upstream task. > > We would encourage anyone who is a developer to join MOTU and later > core-dev so you can upload fixes directly. If you submit useful patches > you would also very easily qualify for ubuntu-qa. > > So, now because I'm working on a bug, I need to become a Master Of The Universe?
Somehow I think that this is counter productive. I don't feel that I know enough about the inner workings of Ubuntu to do that membership justice. I can see a time in the future where that may well be the case, but right now, I'm just fixing bugs. I suspect that there are many contributors who would feel uncomfortable with the requirement you are outlining. I think that the suggestion made by Phillip Susi would solve the problem without the memberships you are outlining. On 20/06/07 06:13, Phillip Susi wrote: > Non developers should be able to set these states if the bug is assigned > to them. > -- Onno Benschop Connected via Optus B3 at S31°54'06" - E115°50'39" (Yokine, WA) -- ()/)/)() ..ASCII for Onno.. |>>? ..EBCDIC for Onno.. --- -. -. --- ..Morse for Onno.. Proudly supported by Skipper Trucks, Highway1, Concept AV, Sony Central, Dalcon ITmaze - ABN: 56 178 057 063 - ph: 04 1219 8888 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
