This is also available on the web at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard/TeamReports/10/November
Chair: Martin Pitt Present: Colin Watson, Kees Cook, Scott James Remnant Guests: Scott Kitterman, Allison Randall, John Lenton, Eric Casteleijn Next chair: sabdfl (carried over) Action review ------------- * Colin to ensure that documentation on nature of extras.ubuntu.com archive makes it into process docs, and ensure that ARB legality checks are synchronised with those of ubuntu-archive. '''DONE''' * Matt to write up Quarterly Brainstorm review and send to TB mailing list. '''DONE''' KDE micro version update exception ---------------------------------- * upstream policy draft: http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Minor_Point_Release_Policy/Draft * Proposed policy: https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/UpdatesPolicy * Approved with 3 for, 0 against. 0 abstained * Martin added this to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions couchdb on lucid: backport 1.0 ------------------------------ * https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2010-November/000563.html * UbuntuOne cloud servers got updated to couchdb 1.0 to handle the load and SSL * According to README and James Westby, the 0.10 -> 1.0 upgrade needs to be done manually for the system wide instance * Impact on per-user couchdbs to be clarified * API is said to not have changed "much", but any change will break existing couchdb applications, and thus needs to be clarified and evaluated * will cause problems with shared home directories and clients with mixed 1.0/0.1 packages * To be investigated by U1 team: introduce couchdb-1.0 package into lucid; what other packages need to be changed, what's the impact? * To be re-discussed at next meeting with more information on the wiki page ARB exception proposal ---------------------- * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PostReleaseApps/MaverickExceptionsProposal * Public python libraries shouldn't be a matter for these packages * Private libraries could be kept in the app dir by setting sys.path * Can quickly templates be updated in lucid to automatically add the application dir to sys.path? * Non-quickly apps would have a requirement to set this up by themselves; is that practical? * .pyc files are not a must, so we could ship maverick packages without them * general opinion was that making an exception for desktop files only would be okay * Some discussion whether using a vendor prefix in /opt would make sense -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel-announce mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce
