On 2008-08-12 12:07, Sebastien Bacher wrote : > the issue seems to be trigger only on some special setups and it should > be sent to the people who write the software on bugzilla.gnome.org, > nobody having the issue seems to be interested in doing that though > that's why the bug has been closed > > (fat32) Unexpected "file modified by another process" warning > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125887 > The so-special setup you speak of is editing files on any FAT(32) disk (eg USB Ramdrive) !!! Is that really to be advertised as beyond the capabilities of Ubuntu?
Please note that some people even dare try to edit files on SMBFS !!! And they're having the same kind of problem, described in Bug #34813. On FAT32, the message is issued only if the file has been open in gedit for quite a time, though. I dropped Bug #34813 a note drawing the attention on the similarities between the two bugs. But they continue to mention SMBFS/CIFS exclusively. Bug #125887 might at least be set to be a duplicate of Bug #34813 instead of "Invalid". If only Bug #34813's title was changed to include FAT(32) too. > Your comments, bug reports, patches and suggestions will help fix bugs > and improve future releases. By closing bugs? -- (fat32) Unexpected "file modified by another process" warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
